Been too long since last post

...so here is another:

I've been on a debate between the president of the swedish humanist organisation, Christer Sturmark and the general secretary of the swedish evangelical alliance, Stefan Gustavsson.

I were wery interested in how the humanists can argue for their belives but was a bit dissapointed at Christer who seemed to avoid to answer the central questions of how to answer were our free will and moral comes from. He seemed more interested in debating against them having any proof burden about their belives (that there isnt any god).

I cant understand that point of view. If you expect anyone to belive any statement you make, you have to argu in favour of your belives and not only against everyone elses.

Someone who could argue in favor of his believes and also answer to Christers arguments was his opponent Stefan. I am very thankful for people like him who God has given a great gift in defending the christian beliefs.